AI in Software Development 2025: What Works, What Doesn't

Hands-on experience with GitHub Copilot, Cursor and Claude Code. Where AI really boosts productivity and where the limits are. With concrete numbers.

AI in Software Development 2025: What Works, What Doesn't

AI is fundamentally changing software development - but not in the way many think. Instead of replacing developers, AI tools are becoming valuable assistants. Here's my hands-on experience: What works, what doesn't, and where the real productivity gains are.

The AI Development Landscape in 2025

The major AI tools for developers have become established:

  • GitHub Copilot: IDE integration for code completion and chat
  • Cursor: AI-native IDE with Claude and GPT integration
  • Claude Code: CLI tool for complex code operations
  • ChatGPT/Claude: General-purpose assistants for explanations and debugging

Where AI Really Helps

1. Boilerplate Code and Scaffolding

This is where AI shines. Controllers, models, migrations, API endpoints - anything that follows a known pattern:

Practical Tip

Formulate precise prompts: "Create a Laravel Resource Controller for Product with index, store, update, destroy. Use Form Requests for validation and API Resources for response."

2. Test Creation

AI can derive meaningful test cases from existing code. Particularly valuable:

  • Edge cases you would overlook yourself
  • Consistent naming conventions
  • Setup/teardown boilerplate

3. Understanding Legacy Code

A game-changer for legacy modernization: AI can:

  • Explain complex functions in natural language
  • Uncover implicit dependencies
  • Provide refactoring suggestions with explanations

Caution with Legacy Code

AI doesn't understand business context. That mysterious handleSpecialCase() function might have a good reason. Always involve domain experts.

4. Documentation

JSDoc, PHPDoc, README generation - AI saves enormous time here and is often more consistent than manually written docs.

Where AI Hits Its Limits

Architecture Decisions

AI doesn't know long-term consequences. It can't answer "Microservices or Monolith?" for your specific team, budget, and business context.

Domain-Specific Knowledge

Industry-specific logic, regulatory requirements, historically grown business rules - AI lacks this context.

Security-Critical Code

AI can introduce security vulnerabilities. Generated code should always undergo security review.

Best Practices for AI-Assisted Development

1. AI as Code Reviewer

Use AI for an initial code review before the team review:

  • "Find potential bugs in this code"
  • "Which edge cases aren't handled?"
  • "How can I make this code more testable?"

2. Pair Programming with AI

Explain your intention to AI before writing code. This forces you to think clearly:

  • What is the goal?
  • What constraints exist?
  • What are the expected edge cases?

3. Iterative Refinement

The first AI suggestion is rarely perfect. Refine iteratively:

  1. Have first draft generated
  2. Provide specific criticism: "The exception handling is too generic"
  3. Request improved version
  4. Finally optimize yourself

Productivity Measurement in Practice

From my experience in Fractional Tech Lead engagements:

Task Without AI With AI Savings
CRUD Controller 45 min 15 min 67%
Unit Tests (10 Cases) 60 min 25 min 58%
Legacy Code Review 90 min 45 min 50%
API Documentation 30 min 10 min 67%
Architecture Design 120 min 100 min 17%

Takeaway: The biggest gains are in repetitive tasks, not complex decisions.

AI Tools in Enterprise Use

Data Privacy and Compliance

Important considerations for enterprise deployment:

  • Code Privacy: What data is sent to AI providers?
  • Self-Hosted Options: Ollama, LocalAI for sensitive projects
  • License Questions: What about copyright of generated code?

Team Onboarding

Successful AI integration requires:

  1. Clear guidelines: What may be done with AI?
  2. Prompt engineering training
  3. Quality assurance: AI code must go through the same review process

Conclusion: AI as Force Multiplier

AI makes good developers better but doesn't replace expertise. The greatest value lies in:

  • Accelerating routine tasks
  • Faster understanding of unfamiliar code
  • More consistent documentation

The art is to deploy AI where it has strengths - and continue to rely on human expertise for architectural decisions.

AI-Assisted Legacy Analysis

Do you have a complex legacy system? With AI support, I analyze your code faster and more thoroughly.

Facing similar challenges?

Support with legacy modernization, architecture decisions and technical audits.

Free Consultation
Share this article: